Jet Brain: Why Primary Students Shouldn’t Fly a Cessna Like a 737

Jet Brain: Why Primary Students Shouldn't Fly a Cessna Like a 737 — video thumbnail (Rod Machado)

In short: Jet Brain is Rod Machado’s name for a mindset in which some flight instructors teach primary students to fly small piston airplanes as if they were airliners. He argues that small-airplane skills transfer to jets, but jet procedures rarely transfer down, and that wide patterns and heavy automation can weaken the foundation students need.

Video: “Jet Brain: Small Isn’t the Same as Big” by Rod Machado, from his YouTube channel.

What you’ll learn

  • What Rod means by Jet Brain and how he first encountered it
  • Why stick-and-rudder skills from small airplanes carry up to jets, but not the reverse
  • How extended, jet-style traffic patterns can put a single-engine airplane beyond gliding distance of the runway
  • Why autopilot proficiency should never replace hands-on flying skills
  • Rod’s critique of energy-state language and fly-like-you-train lesson plans
  • Where he thinks the fix will come from: flight schools, chief pilots and instructors

Meet Jetman

Rod traces the idea to a fellow instructor from decades ago who earned a Boeing 737 type rating and returned announcing that primary students should be taught jet procedures. From then on, every maneuver had a checklist and an airline-style standard. Rod calls this an instructional pathology: well-meaning, but it undermines the basics.

He describes instructors in a 172 calling out V1, asking for an after-takeoff checklist or having students pantomime raising landing gear on a fixed-gear airplane. Rod suggests it often comes from aspirational modeling, where an instructor eager to reach the airlines projects that goal onto students who simply want to learn to fly.

Skills Flow Up, Not Down

Rod’s central point is that nearly everything learned in small airplanes, like coordinated flight, stall awareness and precise landings, applies to larger ones, while jet-specific habits rarely apply to a trainer. Jets typically operate on IFR flight plans with two pilots sharing the workload; a student in a Cherokee flies VFR and manages everything alone.

The traffic pattern is his clearest example. A single-engine airplane is safest flown within power-off gliding distance of the runway, traffic permitting. Rod shows a flight track of a 172 on a training flight extending downwind nearly three miles past the abeam point with no traffic present. Jet-style wide, low patterns erode both safety margins and a student’s sense of the airplane’s glide. He also cautions against students using a sophisticated autopilot from takeoff to pattern without touching the controls.

The Bigger Picture

Rod believes FAA guidance shares some responsibility. He prefers the classic phrasing of attitude plus power equals performance over newer energy-state wording, and argues pilots of any airplane must think in airspeed and altitude first. He is also skeptical of starting first lessons on cross-country trips instead of the practice area.

His remedy is a renewed emphasis on small-airplane flying, driven by chief pilots and instructors at the flight school level. He is careful to say the condition affects some instructors, certainly not all.

Go deeper with Rod Machado

Rod teaches the stick-and-rudder fundamentals he champions here, from attitude flying to pattern work, in his flight training course. Learn more in How to Fly an Airplane eCourse.

Looking for a flight instructor or flight school near you? Browse instructors and training programs on Skyfarer.


Affiliate disclosure: Skyfarer may earn a commission from qualifying purchases via our links. This funds our content for pilots.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Aviation News, Articles & Resources | Skyfarer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading